Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-cvs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38889 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2005 18:05:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jan 2005 18:05:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 94415 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2005 18:05:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-cvs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 94373 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2005 18:05:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cvs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list cvs@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for cvs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 66607 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2005 17:44:03 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) X-Authentication-Warning: scotch.ics.uci.edu: jerenk set sender to justin@erenkrantz.com using -f Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:43:38 -0800 From: Justin Erenkrantz To: dev@httpd.apache.org Cc: cvs@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r124599 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/config5.m4 Message-ID: <20050123174338.GG2138@scotch.ics.uci.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Justin Erenkrantz , dev@httpd.apache.org, cvs@httpd.apache.org References: <20050108015727.13923.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <6.2.0.14.2.20050110011053.05e85ac0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20050110011053.05e85ac0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0-r105955 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-r105955 (2004-11-20) on scotch.ics.uci.edu X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 01:11:34AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Please describe what this actually does? > > Are we back to libproxy.la, libssl.la after this change? For static modules, yes. This was modified in r102381 by Joe: --- Correct use of libtool: libtool convenience libraries which are to be linked directly into a program must be linked using -static and not -module. Fixes build issues with libtool HEAD. --- Erik's change just catches up the manual modules to this change. -- justin