httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From minf...@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Sun, 03 Oct 2004 15:57:55 GMT
minfrin     2004/10/03 08:57:55

  Modified:    .        Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH STATUS
  Log:
  Add some votes
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  No                   revision
  No                   revision
  1.751.2.1102 +5 -5      httpd-2.0/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.751.2.1101
  retrieving revision 1.751.2.1102
  diff -u -r1.751.2.1101 -r1.751.2.1102
  --- STATUS	2 Oct 2004 20:03:43 -0000	1.751.2.1101
  +++ STATUS	3 Oct 2004 15:57:54 -0000	1.751.2.1102
  @@ -88,11 +88,11 @@
   
       *) Correctly store cache content type. PR 30278
          modules/experimental/mod_disk_cache.c?r1=1.62&r2=1.63
  -       +1: stoddard, jerenkrantz
  +       +1: stoddard, jerenkrantz, minfrin
   
       *) Do not store aborted content. PR 21492.
          modules/experimental/mod_disk_cache.c?r1=1.63&r2=1.64
  -       +1: stoddard, jerenkrantz
  +       +1: stoddard, jerenkrantz, minfrin
   
       *) Try to correctly follow RFC 2616 13.3 on validating stale cache
          responses by teaching mod_cache's cache_select_url and
  @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
           modules/experimental/mod_cache.h?r1=1.50&r2=1.51
           modules/experimental/mod_disk_cache.c?r1=1.64&r2=1.65
           modules/experimental/mod_mem_cache.c?r1=1.117&r2=1.118
  -       +1: stoddard, jerenkrantz
  +       +1: stoddard, jerenkrantz, minfrin
   
       *) mod_rewrite: Fix 0 bytes write into random memory position. PR 31036.
          (2.0 + 1.3)
  @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@
          load balancing support in mod_proxy.
            include/scoreboard.h: 1.52
            server/scoreboard.c: 1.75
  -       +1: minfrin
  +       +0: minfrin: it makes sense for v2.1 or v2.2
          -0: nd, jerenkrantz
              nd: -0 as in "it should be considered as a 2.1 feature".
                 If the modified structures are public (are they?), I'm just -1.
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message