httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From traw...@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Thu, 01 May 2003 13:20:33 GMT
trawick     2003/05/01 06:20:33

  Modified:    .        Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH STATUS
  Log:
  complicated
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  No                   revision
  
  
  No                   revision
  
  
  1.751.2.235 +10 -7     httpd-2.0/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.751.2.234
  retrieving revision 1.751.2.235
  diff -u -r1.751.2.234 -r1.751.2.235
  --- STATUS	1 May 2003 11:36:05 -0000	1.751.2.234
  +++ STATUS	1 May 2003 13:20:33 -0000	1.751.2.235
  @@ -186,12 +186,14 @@
         See MessageID: <5.2.0.9.2.20030405165151.01f1fe48@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
         for a complete patch rollup of this and the two following patches.
         +1: wrowe, jim
  -      +1 (concept): trawick (working with this as time allows; seeing
  -         warnings in our code on RH 8 with OpenSSL 0.9.6b; I expect
  -         that overall we're better off and need to commit this and
  -         then tweak later with smaller, easier-to-review changes :) 
  -         I'll update my vote as soon as I give up trying to find 
  -         regression)
  +      +1: trawick, if the patch is really 
  +          http://www.apache.org/~trawick/20030501.ssl.compat.patch
  +          the latest patch in the thread you mention won't apply
  +          because of a #include change that went to STABLE later (sorry);
  +          that is resolved in the patch, and ssl_toolkit_compat.h
  +          r1.32 is in it too...  the more extensive change of "const
  +          SSL*" vs. "SSL*" led to new issues which
  +          ssl_toolkit_compat.h r1.32 resolves for me on AIX and RH 8.
   
       * mod_ssl compile failure (or maybe warning, depending on
         compiler) with 0.9.7a and later
  @@ -204,6 +206,7 @@
                  users build with; I hope folks who perhaps are not
                  interested in wrowe's extensive compatibility cleanup
                  (above) will look at this independently
  +      DELETE ME when the SSLC 2.3 compatibility entry above is removed
   
       * Enable coredumps on Linux 2.4+ if CoreDumpDirectory is coded
         os/unix/unixd.c                 r1.57
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message