httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@attglobal.net>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server .cvsignore Makefile.in
Date Mon, 02 Dec 2002 12:47:51 GMT
wsanchez@apache.org writes:

> wsanchez    2002/11/29 03:05:59
> 
>   Modified:    .        Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH CHANGES acinclude.m4
>                         buildconf configure.in
>                build    Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH binbuild.sh
>                modules/aaa Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH config.m4
>                modules/filters Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH config.m4
>                modules/mappers Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH config9.m4
>                server   Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH .cvsignore Makefile.in
>   Added:       build    Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH PrintPath config.guess
>                         config.sub
>   Log:
>   Back-port changes to allow build without an in-tree apr and apr-util.

Why does the stable tree need this?

Why can't we wait more than a few hours to merge such extensive
changes into the stable tree?

At the moment it looks like we're at an impasse on whether or not to
review before merging back to stable, but the very least people can do
when it is not a trivial change, particularly for build issues, is
wait a while to to see what blows up.

-- 
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Mime
View raw message