httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wilfredo Sánchez <>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server .cvsignore
Date Tue, 03 Dec 2002 08:51:15 GMT
   Well, I appreciate that, and apologize if it was a bad thing.

   As to why in stable...  This wasn't a major change.  It doesn't 
change the build output, and enabled a new way to build which I and at 
least some others think is important.  That is, I think 
that--particularly for the stable tree--we should stop building apr as 
if it were part of httpd and use stable releases of apr.  This is a 
step in that direction.

   That said, I agree it should have waited so as to let other people 
give it a whirl.  My bad.  Bad Fred.


On Monday, December 2, 2002, at 04:47  AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:

> Why does the stable tree need this?
> Why can't we wait more than a few hours to merge such extensive
> changes into the stable tree?
> At the moment it looks like we're at an impasse on whether or not to
> review before merging back to stable, but the very least people can do
> when it is not a trivial change, particularly for build issues, is
> wait a while to to see what blows up.

View raw message