httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From j..@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Sun, 24 Nov 2002 19:28:04 GMT
jim         2002/11/24 11:28:04

  Modified:    .        Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH STATUS
  Log:
  Considering that under 1.3 we have not felt the need to revert
  back to r-t-c, and that 1.3 is used by a *lot* more people
  and so stability must be even more of a concern, I fail
  to see why we need to move to a r-t-c for the 2.0 branch to
  "ensure" stability or for any of the other suggested reasons.
  
  Certainly any issues with the 1.3 release problems will themselves
  be moot since the release procedure for 2.x is very different.
  r-t-c, IMO, will do little more than stifle development on
  a tree that really requires *more* development.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  No                   revision
  
  
  No                   revision
  
  
  1.751.2.9 +2 -2      httpd-2.0/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.751.2.8
  retrieving revision 1.751.2.9
  diff -u -r1.751.2.8 -r1.751.2.9
  --- STATUS	24 Nov 2002 08:19:13 -0000	1.751.2.8
  +++ STATUS	24 Nov 2002 19:28:04 -0000	1.751.2.9
  @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
         on APACHE_2_0_BRANCH (no vetoes, this is a straight vote.)
          R-T-C:   trawick, wrowe, jerenkrantz
          Abstain: 
  -       C-T-R:   BrianP, aaron
  +       C-T-R:   BrianP, aaron, jim
   
       * httpd-std.conf and friends;
   
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message