httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From stri...@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Wed, 20 Nov 2002 21:43:24 GMT
striker     2002/11/20 13:43:24

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  Update votes...
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.749     +7 -8      httpd-2.0/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.748
  retrieving revision 1.749
  diff -u -r1.748 -r1.749
  --- STATUS	20 Nov 2002 21:28:21 -0000	1.748
  +++ STATUS	20 Nov 2002 21:43:24 -0000	1.749
  @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
         modules are deferred for the next minor version bump (e.g. 2.1, 2.2 
         or 3.0).
           +1: wrowe, jerenkrantz, aaron, brianp, trawick, stoddard, jwoolley,
  -            rbowen, rederpj, jim
  +            rbowen, rederpj, jim, striker
            0: 
           -1: 
   
  @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
           +1: wrowe, aaron, trawick, stoddard, jwoolley, rbowen, gregames,
               rederpj, jim
            0: jerenkrantz
  -        -1: 
  +        -1: striker 
   
       * Adopt an even/odd release paradigm (see VERSIONING) such that
         even numbered releases are stable, and odd numbered releases 
  @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
         patches are (generally) first applied to the development branch,
         tested, and then (after vote) applied to the stable branch.
           +1: wrowe, jerenkrantz, aaron, trawick, stoddard, jwoolley, rbowen,
  -            gregames, rederpj, jim
  +            gregames, rederpj, jim, striker
            0: 
           -1: 
   
  @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
         to 2.1.0-dev.
           +1 [from APACHE_2_0_43]: wrowe, aaron, trawick, stoddard, jwoolley,
                                    gregames, rederpj, jim
  -        +1 [from HEAD]: 
  +        +1 [from HEAD]: striker
            0: jerenkrantz
           -1: 
   
  @@ -117,9 +117,8 @@
   
         d) Installing a set of default config files when upgrading a server
            doesn't make ANY sense at all.
  -         +1:   striker
  -           ianh - medium/big sites don't use 'standard config' anyway, as it
  -                  usually needs major customizations
  +         +1:   ianh - medium/big sites don't use 'standard config' anyway, as it
  +                      usually needs major customizations
            -1:   Ken, wrowe, jwoolley, jim
              wrowe - diff is wonderful when comparing old/new default configs,
                      even for customized sites that ianh mentions
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message