Mailing-List: contact cvs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sender: trawick@rdu74-177-063.nc.rr.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: httpd-2.0-cvs@apache.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
References: <20021028043547.16189.qmail@icarus.apache.org>
From: Jeff Trawick <trawick@attglobal.net>
Date: 28 Oct 2002 07:01:15 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20021028043547.16189.qmail@icarus.apache.org>
Message-ID: <m3lm4i7oxg.fsf@rdu74-177-063.nc.rr.com>
Lines: 34
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

wrowe@apache.org writes:

> wrowe       2002/10/27 20:35:47
> 
>   Modified:    .        STATUS
>   Log:
>     Submitted for your consideration.

Thanks!

>   +    * Adopt an even/odd release paradigm (see VERSIONING) such that
>   +      even numbered releases are stable, and odd numbered releases 
>   +      are development efforts, keeping in the tradition of Linux, 
>   +      Perl, etc.  In pratical terms, this implies C-T-R-T-C, where
>   +      patches are (generally) first applied to the development branch,
>   +      tested, and then (after vote) applied to the stable branch.
>   +        +1: wrowe
>   +         0: 
>   +        -1: 
>   +
>   +    * Branch APACHE_2_0_BRANCH today, changing the version in CVS HEAD
>   +      to 2.1.0-dev.
>   +        +1 [from APACHE_2_0_43]: wrowe
>   +        +1 [from HEAD]: 
>   +         0: 
>   +        -1: 

We need matching apr and apr-util trees which are just as stable.

That isn't necessarily what apr needs as it gears up for 1.0.

-- 
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
Born in Roswell... married an alien...