httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jwool...@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Tue, 28 May 2002 15:22:56 GMT
jwoolley    02/05/28 08:22:56

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  Mostly harmless.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.631     +16 -7     httpd-2.0/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.630
  retrieving revision 1.631
  diff -u -d -u -r1.630 -r1.631
  --- STATUS	27 May 2002 14:00:46 -0000	1.630
  +++ STATUS	28 May 2002 15:22:55 -0000	1.631
  @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
   APACHE 2.0 STATUS:                                              -*-text-*-
  -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/05/27 14:00:46 $]
  +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/05/28 15:22:55 $]
   
   Release:
   
  @@ -53,6 +53,11 @@
   
   RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
   
  +    * HP/UX 10.20: compile breakage in APR.  Looks like it should be easy
  +      to fix, probably just some extraneous #include's that are fouling
  +      things up.
  +      PR: 9457
  +
       * decide if the MMN bump was warranted
   
       * Darwin: httpd won't start.  Hangs looking up 0.0.0.0 during config
  @@ -62,6 +67,9 @@
   
       * Win32: httpd won't start.  There was a command line args problem
         that got fixed, but now something else is wrong.
  +      Status: one problem here might be a "" argument being returned from
  +      the rewrite_args hook getting caught by Jeff's patch to check
  +      args more strictly.
         Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20020525222410.02a629d0@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
                     <00ca01c2033e$f1c54c10$a6271b09@sashimi>
                     <5.1.0.14.2.20020524115533.02785e28@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
  @@ -75,6 +83,11 @@
                     <COEELENBBCHBFEPPGDOPCEPPGPAA.ake@meepzor.com>
   
       * To high-free patch or not to high-free patch?
  +      Status: Cliff thinks we need more time to test this
  +      code and sniff out any side-effects it may uncover and is
  +      leaning toward 2.0.38 but will reserve final judgement
  +      since it's as yet unclear how soon 2.0.37 will be ready.
  +      (vote tally for 2.0.37: +1: Sander, Ian; -0: Brian, Cliff)
         Message-ID: <JLEGKKNELMHCJPNMOKHOGEIIFOAA.striker@apache.org>
                     <1022371367.23007.13.camel@mypc1.pacbell.net>
   
  @@ -89,12 +102,8 @@
       * apr_brigade_write() is not flushing in all cases it should
         Status: Cliff will fix this
   
  -    * need consensus on Cliff's /dev/random vs. /dev/urandom question.
  -      Is there a better alternative than picking strictly one or the other?
  -      Message-ID:
  -      <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205251718300.31784-100000@deepthought.cs.virginia.edu>
  -      <20020522202404.D27903@apache.org>
  -      <20020522210345.E2800@clove.org>
  +    * /dev/random vs. /dev/urandom
  +      Status: Cliff is working on a patch to make this configurable.
   
       * server pushed CGI's not working.  (Is this a showstopper??)
         PR: 8482
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message