httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From rbo...@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod mod_unique_id.xml
Date Mon, 18 Feb 2002 03:53:30 GMT
rbowen      02/02/17 19:53:30

  Added:       docs/manual/mod mod_unique_id.xml
  Log:
  Conversion to XML
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.1                  httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod/mod_unique_id.xml
  
  Index: mod_unique_id.xml
  ===================================================================
  <?xml version="1.0"?>
  <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../style/manual.xsl"?>
  <modulesynopsis>
  
  <name>mod_unique_id</name>
  <status>Extension</status>
  <identifier>unique_id_module</identifier>
  <sourcefile>mod_unique_id.c</sourcefile>
  <compatibility>Available in Apache 1.3 and later.</compatibility>
  
  <description>This module provides an environment variable with a unique
  identifier for each request.</description>
  
  <summary>
  
      <p>This module provides a magic token for each request which is
      guaranteed to be unique across "all" requests under very
      specific conditions. The unique identifier is even unique
      across multiple machines in a properly configured cluster of
      machines. The environment variable <code>UNIQUE_ID</code> is
      set to the identifier for each request. Unique identifiers are
      useful for various reasons which are beyond the scope of this
      document.</p>
  </summary>
  
  <section>
      <title>Theory</title>
  
      <p>First a brief recap of how the Apache server works on Unix
      machines. This feature currently isn't supported on Windows NT.
      On Unix machines, Apache creates several children, the children
      process requests one at a time. Each child can serve multiple
      requests in its lifetime. For the purpose of this discussion,
      the children don't share any data with each other. We'll refer
      to the children as httpd processes.</p>
  
      <p>Your website has one or more machines under your
      administrative control, together we'll call them a cluster of
      machines. Each machine can possibly run multiple instances of
      Apache. All of these collectively are considered "the
      universe", and with certain assumptions we'll show that in this
      universe we can generate unique identifiers for each request,
      without extensive communication between machines in the
      cluster.</p>
  
      <p>The machines in your cluster should satisfy these
      requirements. (Even if you have only one machine you should
      synchronize its clock with NTP.)</p>
  
      <ul>
        <li>The machines' times are synchronized via NTP or other
        network time protocol.</li>
  
        <li>The machines' hostnames all differ, such that the module
        can do a hostname lookup on the hostname and receive a
        different IP address for each machine in the cluster.</li>
      </ul>
  
      <p>As far as operating system assumptions go, we assume that
      pids (process ids) fit in 32-bits. If the operating system uses
      more than 32-bits for a pid, the fix is trivial but must be
      performed in the code.</p>
  
      <p>Given those assumptions, at a single point in time we can
      identify any httpd process on any machine in the cluster from
      all other httpd processes. The machine's IP address and the pid
      of the httpd process are sufficient to do this. So in order to
      generate unique identifiers for requests we need only
      distinguish between different points in time.</p>
  
      <p>To distinguish time we will use a Unix timestamp (seconds
      since January 1, 1970 UTC), and a 16-bit counter. The timestamp
      has only one second granularity, so the counter is used to
      represent up to 65536 values during a single second. The
      quadruple <em>( ip_addr, pid, time_stamp, counter )</em> is
      sufficient to enumerate 65536 requests per second per httpd
      process. There are issues however with pid reuse over time, and
      the counter is used to alleviate this issue.</p>
  
      <p>When an httpd child is created, the counter is initialized
      with ( current microseconds divided by 10 ) modulo 65536 (this
      formula was chosen to eliminate some variance problems with the
      low order bits of the microsecond timers on some systems). When
      a unique identifier is generated, the time stamp used is the
      time the request arrived at the web server. The counter is
      incremented every time an identifier is generated (and allowed
      to roll over).</p>
  
      <p>The kernel generates a pid for each process as it forks the
      process, and pids are allowed to roll over (they're 16-bits on
      many Unixes, but newer systems have expanded to 32-bits). So
      over time the same pid will be reused. However unless it is
      reused within the same second, it does not destroy the
      uniqueness of our quadruple. That is, we assume the system does
      not spawn 65536 processes in a one second interval (it may even
      be 32768 processes on some Unixes, but even this isn't likely
      to happen).</p>
  
      <p>Suppose that time repeats itself for some reason. That is,
      suppose that the system's clock is screwed up and it revisits a
      past time (or it is too far forward, is reset correctly, and
      then revisits the future time). In this case we can easily show
      that we can get pid and time stamp reuse. The choice of
      initializer for the counter is intended to help defeat this.
      Note that we really want a random number to initialize the
      counter, but there aren't any readily available numbers on most
      systems (<em>i.e.</em>, you can't use rand() because you need
      to seed the generator, and can't seed it with the time because
      time, at least at one second resolution, has repeated itself).
      This is not a perfect defense.</p>
  
      <p>How good a defense is it? Suppose that one of your machines
      serves at most 500 requests per second (which is a very
      reasonable upper bound at this writing, because systems
      generally do more than just shovel out static files). To do
      that it will require a number of children which depends on how
      many concurrent clients you have. But we'll be pessimistic and
      suppose that a single child is able to serve 500 requests per
      second. There are 1000 possible starting counter values such
      that two sequences of 500 requests overlap. So there is a 1.5%
      chance that if time (at one second resolution) repeats itself
      this child will repeat a counter value, and uniqueness will be
      broken. This was a very pessimistic example, and with real
      world values it's even less likely to occur. If your system is
      such that it's still likely to occur, then perhaps you should
      make the counter 32 bits (by editing the code).</p>
  
      <p>You may be concerned about the clock being "set back" during
      summer daylight savings. However this isn't an issue because
      the times used here are UTC, which "always" go forward. Note
      that x86 based Unixes may need proper configuration for this to
      be true -- they should be configured to assume that the
      motherboard clock is on UTC and compensate appropriately. But
      even still, if you're running NTP then your UTC time will be
      correct very shortly after reboot.</p>
  
      <p>The <code>UNIQUE_ID</code> environment variable is
      constructed by encoding the 112-bit (32-bit IP address, 32 bit
      pid, 32 bit time stamp, 16 bit counter) quadruple using the
      alphabet <code>[A-Za-z0-9@-]</code> in a manner similar to MIME
      base64 encoding, producing 19 characters. The MIME base64
      alphabet is actually <code>[A-Za-z0-9+/]</code> however
      <code>+</code> and <code>/</code> need to be specially encoded
      in URLs, which makes them less desirable. All values are
      encoded in network byte ordering so that the encoding is
      comparable across architectures of different byte ordering. The
      actual ordering of the encoding is: time stamp, IP address,
      pid, counter. This ordering has a purpose, but it should be
      emphasized that applications should not dissect the encoding.
      Applications should treat the entire encoded
      <code>UNIQUE_ID</code> as an opaque token, which can be
      compared against other <code>UNIQUE_ID</code>s for equality
      only.</p>
  
      <p>The ordering was chosen such that it's possible to change
      the encoding in the future without worrying about collision
      with an existing database of <code>UNIQUE_ID</code>s. The new
      encodings should also keep the time stamp as the first element,
      and can otherwise use the same alphabet and bit length. Since
      the time stamps are essentially an increasing sequence, it's
      sufficient to have a <em>flag second</em> in which all machines
      in the cluster stop serving and request, and stop using the old
      encoding format. Afterwards they can resume requests and begin
      issuing the new encodings.</p>
  
      <p>This we believe is a relatively portable solution to this
      problem. It can be extended to multithreaded systems like
      Windows NT, and can grow with future needs. The identifiers
      generated have essentially an infinite life-time because future
      identifiers can be made longer as required. Essentially no
      communication is required between machines in the cluster (only
      NTP synchronization is required, which is low overhead), and no
      communication between httpd processes is required (the
      communication is implicit in the pid value assigned by the
      kernel). In very specific situations the identifier can be
      shortened, but more information needs to be assumed (for
      example the 32-bit IP address is overkill for any site, but
      there is no portable shorter replacement for it). </p>
  </section>
  
  
  </modulesynopsis>
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message