httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jerenkra...@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Wed, 06 Feb 2002 22:34:47 GMT
jerenkrantz    02/02/06 14:34:47

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  This issue is completed.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.487     +1 -16     httpd-2.0/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.486
  retrieving revision 1.487
  diff -u -r1.486 -r1.487
  --- STATUS	6 Feb 2002 22:32:34 -0000	1.486
  +++ STATUS	6 Feb 2002 22:34:47 -0000	1.487
  @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
   APACHE 2.0 STATUS:                                              -*-text-*-
  -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/06 22:32:34 $]
  +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/06 22:34:47 $]
   
   Release:
   
  @@ -491,21 +491,6 @@
           Questions; htdbm exists, time to kill dbmmanage, or does it remain
                      useful as a perl dbm management example?  If we keep it,
                      do we address the issue above?
  -
  -    * use apu_dbm in mod_auth_dbm
  -        Status: Greg +1 (low-priority volunteer)
  -        Justin says: "Seems like this is already there, so should we just 
  -                      remove the other DBM code in that file?  If you want 
  -                      to use gdbm, or dbm, etc, you should tell apr-util."
  -        Will says: "bs - I may choose the fastest - most efficient native
  -                    dbm implementation, for shared proc caches, ssl session
  -                    caching, etc, but that has nothing to do with maintaining
  -                    a userlist via dbm, which has to remain readable between
  -                    builds/machines, etc.  The use-multiple database schema
  -                    for apr-util would let us do this with just apr, though."
  -        Ian says:  "multi-dbm is in, but it still has ndbm support hardcoded
  -                    is this still required? isn't ndbm supported via gdbm?"
  -
   
       * Integrate mod_dav.
           Some additional items remaining:
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message