httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jerenkra...@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Sun, 03 Feb 2002 18:38:31 GMT
jerenkrantz    02/02/03 10:38:31

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  - Add note on the bad AP_DEBUG_ASSERT call.  Is this a showstopper or can
    it be indicated in the 2.0.31 release notes?  Voice your opinions.
  - The worker CGI test failure Ken sees seems to be a problem with
    perl or httpd-test as no one else seems to be able to reproduce it.
    So, let's try to demote this.
  - I have no earthly idea what rbb is talking about.  Whatever it may be,
    I can't fathom that it'd stop a release.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.441     +13 -2     httpd-2.0/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.440
  retrieving revision 1.441
  diff -u -r1.440 -r1.441
  --- STATUS	3 Feb 2002 18:25:41 -0000	1.440
  +++ STATUS	3 Feb 2002 18:38:31 -0000	1.441
  @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
   APACHE 2.0 STATUS:						-*-text-*-
  -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/03 18:25:41 $]
  +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/03 18:38:31 $]
   
   Release:
   
  @@ -60,6 +60,12 @@
                   +1: Ian, Justin
                   +0:
                   -1:
  +            * erroneous check in an AP_DEBUG_ASSERT() call.  Only happens
  +              in maintainer mode.  Fixed in modules/http/http_protocol.c
  +              revision 1.391.  Add item in release notes:
  +                +1: Justin
  +                +0:
  +                -1:
               * hasn't run for 3 days on Daedalus 
               * the release has underscores instead of periods.
   
  @@ -74,7 +80,11 @@
       * Test suite failures:
         o worker is also failing some of the 'cgi' subtests
         (see <URL:http://Source-Zone.Org/Apache/regression/>):
  -        Justin says: "Worker should be fine and passes httpd-test here."
  +        Justin says: "Worker should be fine and passes httpd-test here.
  +                      If you can provide evidence that it can be reproduced
  +                      outside of httpd-test, then it's a showstopper.  I
  +                      think it's a perl or a httpd-test problem."
  +        Not a showstopper: Justin
   
       * If any request gets to the core handler, without a flag that this 
         r->filename was tested by dir/file_walk, we need to 500 at the very 
  @@ -96,6 +106,7 @@
           Justin says: "Is this really a showstopper?  This has been here
                         forever.  What's wrong?  Does this have to do with
                         autoconf or m4?"
  +        Not a showstopper: Justin
   
       * Convert all instances of the old apr_lock_t type to the new
         types (once they are fully supported in APR).
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message