Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apache-cvs-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 28537 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2001 15:17:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apache-cvs-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list apache-cvs@apache.org Received: (qmail 28489 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2001 15:17:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apache-1.3-cvs@apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-1.3-cvs@apache.org Date: 9 Apr 2001 15:17:03 -0000 Message-ID: <20010409151703.28457.qmail@apache.org> From: wrowe@apache.org To: httpd-docs-1.3-cvs@apache.org Subject: cvs commit: httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual windows.html wrowe 01/04/09 08:17:03 Modified: htdocs/manual windows.html Log: Fix two issues, display text that folks tried to use as the HREF, and the (now defunct) deja reference Revision Changes Path 1.49 +5 -5 httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/windows.html Index: windows.html =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/windows.html,v retrieving revision 1.48 retrieving revision 1.49 diff -u -r1.48 -r1.49 --- windows.html 2001/03/28 21:25:41 1.48 +++ windows.html 2001/04/09 15:17:02 1.49 @@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ Frequently Asked Questions page and the other relevant documentation topics. If you still have a question or problem, post it to the - comp.infosystems.www.servers.ms−windows newsgroup, where many + comp.infosystems.www.servers.ms-windows newsgroup, where many Apache users and several contributions are more than willing to answer new and obscure questions about using Apache on Windows.

-

- deja.com's newsgroup archives offer easy browsing of previous questions. - Searching the newsgroup archives, you will usually find your question was - already asked and answered by other users!

+

+ groups.google.com's newsgroup archive offers easy browsing of previous + questions. Searching the newsgroup archives, you will usually find your + question was already asked and answered by other users!

Warning: Apache on NT has not yet been optimized for performance. Apache still performs best, and is most reliable on Unix platforms.