Return-Path:
Delivered-To: apmail-apache-cvs-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 28537 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2001 15:17:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact apache-cvs-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
list-help:
list-unsubscribe:
list-post:
Delivered-To: mailing list apache-cvs@apache.org
Received: (qmail 28489 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2001 15:17:04 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-apache-1.3-cvs@apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-1.3-cvs@apache.org
Date: 9 Apr 2001 15:17:03 -0000
Message-ID: <20010409151703.28457.qmail@apache.org>
From: wrowe@apache.org
To: httpd-docs-1.3-cvs@apache.org
Subject: cvs commit: httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual windows.html
wrowe 01/04/09 08:17:03
Modified: htdocs/manual windows.html
Log:
Fix two issues, display text that folks tried to use as the HREF, and
the (now defunct) deja reference
Revision Changes Path
1.49 +5 -5 httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/windows.html
Index: windows.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/windows.html,v
retrieving revision 1.48
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u -r1.48 -r1.49
--- windows.html 2001/03/28 21:25:41 1.48
+++ windows.html 2001/04/09 15:17:02 1.49
@@ -31,14 +31,14 @@
Frequently Asked Questions page and the other
relevant documentation topics. If you still have a question or problem,
post it to the
- comp.infosystems.www.servers.ms−windows newsgroup, where many
+ comp.infosystems.www.servers.ms-windows newsgroup, where many
Apache users and several contributions are more than willing to answer new
and obscure questions about using Apache on Windows.
-
- deja.com's newsgroup archives offer easy browsing of previous questions.
- Searching the newsgroup archives, you will usually find your question was
- already asked and answered by other users!
+
+ groups.google.com's newsgroup archive offers easy browsing of previous
+ questions. Searching the newsgroup archives, you will usually find your
+ question was already asked and answered by other users!
Warning: Apache on NT has not yet been optimized for performance.
Apache still performs best, and is most reliable on Unix platforms.