Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apache-cvs-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 63791 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2000 18:29:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apache-cvs-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list apache-cvs@apache.org Received: (qmail 63756 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2000 18:29:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apache-1.3-cvs@apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-docs-1.3-cvs@apache.org Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 11:29:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Joshua Slive X-Sender: slive@garibaldi.commerce.ubc.ca To: new-httpd@apache.org cc: httpd-docs-1.3-cvs@apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/misc FAQ-E.html In-Reply-To: <20000821175210.36591.qmail@locus.apache.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 21 Aug 2000 coar@locus.apache.org wrote: > coar 00/08/21 10:52:07 > > Modified: htdocs/manual/misc FAQ-E.html > Log: > Some Linux vendor appears to be distributing Apache with a > bogus httpd.conf file.. I can't see any other reason for this > to be common to so many problems. > >From the reports that I have seen, this seems to be caused by a faulty installation of Linuxconf in Redhat 6.x mangling the config files. You might want to note this, since if they try to use linuxconf again, they will wind up with the same problem. There are a bunch of entries in Redhat's bug database about it, with no solution presented (other than not using linuxconf). -- Joshua Slive slive@finance.commerce.ubc.ca http://finance.commerce.ubc.ca/~slive/ Phone: (604) 822-1871