Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apache-cvs-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 74732 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2000 23:23:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apache-cvs-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list apache-cvs@apache.org Received: (qmail 74706 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2000 23:23:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apache-2.0-cvs@apache.org Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 18:23:43 -0500 (EST) From: rbb@apache.org X-Sender: rbb@shell.ntrnet.net To: new-httpd@apache.org Cc: apache-2.0-cvs@apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-2.0/src Makefile.in In-Reply-To: <20000327232122.73761.qmail@locus.apache.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: rbb@shell.ntrnet.net X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 27 Mar 2000 rbb@locus.apache.org wrote: > rbb 00/03/27 15:21:22 > > Modified: src Makefile.in > Log: > Change the name from apache back to httpd. I have just changed the 2.0 binary from apache back to httpd. There were people on this list suggesting that this was the correct thing to do. Plus, people have submitted bugs and mentioned in passing that if we are going to change the name, we should also change the name of the .conf file and other files that reference "httpd". If anybody hates this change, let me know. But it seemed to have support after the first beta. Ryan