httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From c...@hyperreal.org
Subject cvs commit: apache-1.3 STATUS
Date Sat, 20 Mar 1999 18:55:47 GMT
coar        99/03/20 10:55:46

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  	Some updates..
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.657     +7 -4      apache-1.3/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.656
  retrieving revision 1.657
  diff -u -r1.656 -r1.657
  --- STATUS	1999/03/20 15:45:18	1.656
  +++ STATUS	1999/03/20 18:55:45	1.657
  @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
     1.3 STATUS:
  -  Last modified at [$Date: 1999/03/20 15:45:18 $]
  +  Last modified at [$Date: 1999/03/20 18:55:45 $]
   
   Release:
   
  @@ -32,8 +32,9 @@
    i386-unixware-svr4            no      Sameer Parekh
    i386-unknown-freebsd2.1       no      Andrew Wilson, Brian Tao
    i386-unknown-freebsd2.2.8     no      Jim Jagielski
  + i386-whatever-freebsd3.0      no      Ken Coar
    i686-pc-freebsd3.1            no      Ralf S. Engelschall
  - i585-pc-redhat5.2             no      Ralf S. Engelschall
  + i586-pc-redhat5.2             no      Ralf S. Engelschall
    i386-unknown-linux(ELF)       no      Aram Mirzadeh, Michael Douglass
    i386-unknown-netBSD           no      Lars Eilebrecht, Bill <lucid@secret.org>
    i386-unknown-sco3             no      Ben Laurie
  @@ -178,6 +179,9 @@
         MaxConnectionsPerChild or really fix it to actually count
         the number of requests.
         Lars: I think we should really fix.
  +      Ken: Definitely fix this, otherwise an massive series of
  +           requests on the same connection is possible, which
  +           defeats the purpose.
         Jim: The main idea behind this is to avoid problems with
              memory leaks. So it really doesn't matter which we
   	   do, as long as there's a match between the directive
  @@ -344,7 +348,7 @@
   	<01BCDB29.2C04DEB0@caravan.individual.com>
   	<01BCDB2A.F8C09010@caravan.individual.com>
   	Status: Ken +1, Sameer +1, Martin +1, Ben +1 (as long as
  -	we get a single executable)
  +		we get a single executable)
   	Paul: No like Win95 specific stuff
   	Ken: What's W95-specific about it?
   
  @@ -388,7 +392,6 @@
   
       * CGIs
   	- docs on how they work w/scripts
  -	- use registry to find interpreter?
   	- WTF is the buffering coming from?
   	    - we don't have a way to make non-blocking files on NT!
   
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message