httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From c...@hyperreal.org
Subject cvs commit: apache-1.3 STATUS
Date Tue, 09 Jun 1998 21:09:30 GMT
coar        98/06/09 14:09:29

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  	I'm -1 on the new method only because of the "usr/local/apache"
  	and no-source points.  It's not a veto, it's an "I don't like this"
  	vote.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.421     +6 -4      apache-1.3/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.420
  retrieving revision 1.421
  diff -u -r1.420 -r1.421
  --- STATUS	1998/06/09 15:50:03	1.420
  +++ STATUS	1998/06/09 21:09:27	1.421
  @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
              of PRs say they cannot find the httpd :-(
            Pros: <gets filled tomorrow>
            Cons: <gets filled tomorrow>
  -         Status: Ralf -0
  +         Status: Ralf -0, Ken +0
   
         2. The way other projects release binary tarballs, i.e.
            a package containing the installed (binary) files.
  @@ -174,11 +174,13 @@
            - packs the stuff together from ./apache-root only!!
            Already known discussion points:
            - should there be a prefix usr/local/apache in 
  -           the tarball or not because some people think
  -           its useful while others dislike it a lot.
  +           the tarball or not?  Some people think
  +           it's useful while others dislike it a lot.
  +	 - it doesn't include the source.
  +	 - should suexec be prebuilt in a binary tarball?
            Pros: <gets filled tomorrow>
            Cons: <gets filled tomorrow>
  -         Status: Ralf +1, Martin +1
  +         Status: Ralf +1, Martin +1, Ken -1 (not a veto)
   
       * Redefine APACHE_RELEASE. Add another 'bit' to signify whether
         it's a beta or final release. Maybe 'MMNNFFRBB' which means:
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message