From apache-cvs-owner-apache-cvs-archive=hyperreal.org@apache.org Mon Apr 20 20:18:11 1998 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache-cvs-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 1912 invoked by uid 6000); 20 Apr 1998 20:18:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 1852 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 1998 20:18:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apache-1.3-cvs@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 1805 invoked by uid 125); 20 Apr 1998 20:18:06 -0000 Date: 20 Apr 1998 20:18:06 -0000 Message-ID: <19980420201806.1804.qmail@hyperreal.org> From: jim@hyperreal.org To: apache-1.3-cvs@hyperreal.org Subject: cvs commit: apache-1.3 STATUS Sender: apache-cvs-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org jim 98/04/20 13:18:03 Modified: . STATUS Log: Update STATUS Revision Changes Path 1.309 +18 -13 apache-1.3/STATUS Index: STATUS =================================================================== RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v retrieving revision 1.308 retrieving revision 1.309 diff -u -r1.308 -r1.309 --- STATUS 1998/04/20 08:28:48 1.308 +++ STATUS 1998/04/20 20:18:02 1.309 @@ -2,10 +2,12 @@ Release: - 1.3b7: freeze; Hopefully to simply be renamed 1.3.0 + 1.3.0: Shoot for May 16, 1998 Release! - 1.3b6: Tagged APACHE_1_3b6. Possible release 4/20 + 1.3b7: In development + 1.3b6: Tagged APACHE_1_3b6. Announced and Released 4/20/98 + 2.0 : In pre-alpha development, see apache-2.0 repository Guidelines: @@ -162,16 +164,16 @@ * What do we call the binary: apache or httpd? Under UNIX it's httpd, under Win32 it's apache. apache-httpd: Ken +1 - leave it apache: +1 Brian, Ralf, Martin + leave it apache: +1 Brian, Ralf, Martin, Jim * Maybe a http_paths.h file? See +1: Brian, Paul, Ralf, Martin + +0: Jim (not for 1.3.0) * Release builds: Should we provide Configuration or not? Should we 'make all suexec' in src/support? - Ken +1 (possible suexec path issue, though) - Brian +1 + +1: Brian, Jim, Ken +1 (possible suexec path issue, though) * root's environment is inherited by the Apache server. Jim & Ken think we should recommend using 'env' to build the @@ -219,12 +221,6 @@ best interest to continue to support Unix to its utmost, and not delay a release of 1.3.0 waiting for WIN32 issues to be resolved. - Proposal: the next release should be named 1.3b6, and labelled "release - candidate on unix, beta on NT". The release after that will be - called 1.3.0 "stable on unix, beta on NT". - +1: Jim, Ralf, Randy, Brian, Martin - +0: - Notes: Randy: I would also argue that 1.3b6 is _not_ stable. I've been having real fits keeping it alive on a dual processor @@ -233,8 +229,17 @@ * Should we re-enable nagle now that we're non-buffering CGIs? See various messages from Marc in March 98. - * Should we list the operating system's generic name (e.g. Irix, Win32) in - SERVER_VERSION? + * Listing the operating system's generic name (e.g. Irix, Win32) in + SERVER_VERSION: + o Looks like we want to do this... + Implementation: New API function, ap_add_version_component() + that takes a 'const char *' and tacks it onto the end + of the string returned by ap_get_server_version(). + + o Debate: + Unix:Win32:OS/2 in '()' comment + +1: Jim, Martin, Alexei + Irix:AIX:FreeBSD in '()' comment Win32 specific issues: