httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From mar...@hyperreal.org
Subject cvs commit: apache-1.3 STATUS
Date Wed, 01 Apr 1998 14:03:06 GMT
martin      98/04/01 06:03:06

  Modified:    .         STATUS
  Log:
  Vote - and note fix of proxy_util to accept and pass URL's in the format http://user:pass@host/
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.252     +5 -4      apache-1.3/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.251
  retrieving revision 1.252
  diff -u -u -r1.251 -r1.252
  --- STATUS	1998/04/01 11:28:33	1.251
  +++ STATUS	1998/04/01 14:03:05	1.252
  @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@
       * Ken's reworking of the Apache LICENSE
       * Ralf's APache eXtenSion for easy "off-source" extending Apache via DSO
       * Ralf's APACI --without-support option
  +    * Martin's fix accept (and pass) http://user:pass@host proxy requests
   
   Available Patches:
   
  @@ -177,7 +178,7 @@
           currently os_xxx, migrate to ap_xxx: Brian
   
         Public API functions (e.g., palloc)
  -	apapi_xxx: +1: Ken, Brian, Ralf, Martin, Paul, Jim
  +	apapi_xxx: +1: Ken, Brian, Ralf, Paul, Jim
   	appublic_xxx:
   	appub_xxx:
   
  @@ -189,7 +190,7 @@
   	apint_xxx: +1: Ralf (int = internal)
       
         Alternate proposal:
  -      Everything should be ap_: +1 Dean, Randy, Roy
  +      Everything should be ap_: +1 Dean, Randy, Roy, Martin
   	Why?  Because it's far easier to type, and damn it, I
   	type these things far too much.  Just using apapi_ for
   	the few hours I did while writing apapi_vformatter is
  @@ -232,7 +233,7 @@
   
       * Maybe a http_paths.h file? See
   	<Pine.BSF.3.95q.971209222046.25627D-100000@valis.worldgate.com>
  -	Dean +1, Brian +1, Paul +1, Ralf +1
  +	+1: Dean, Brian, Paul, Ralf, Martin
   
       * Release builds: Should we provide Configuration or not?
         Should we 'make all suexec' in src/support?
  @@ -297,7 +298,7 @@
   	Proposal: the next release should be named 1.3b6, and labelled "release
   	    candidate on unix, beta on NT".  The release after that will be
   	    called 1.3.0 "stable on unix, beta on NT".
  -	    +1: Jim, Ralf, Randy, Brian
  +	    +1: Jim, Ralf, Randy, Brian, Martin
   	    +0: Dean
   
               Notes:
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message