httpd-cvs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From dgau...@hyperreal.org
Subject cvs commit: apache-1.3 STATUS
Date Thu, 26 Mar 1998 19:44:46 GMT
dgaudet     98/03/26 11:44:46

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  So it's sunny now, and the outdoors is calling me... and any monumental
  fixes I've been thinking about are somewhere deep in my mind I can't
  find at the moment.  I'm ready to "throw in the towel" so that unix
  1.3.0 can get out there, and get into reviewer's hot little hands.  I
  know of a few groups that want to benchmark it, but really would prefer
  to benchmark something released.  I really don't want to see us with
  win32 tied to unix release schedule forever... it's pointless.
  
  It's all just names anyhow.  Whether we call it a beta or a current
  release it's just a name.  It's time we at least had a "release candidate"
  to use the 1.2 terminology... I'm with Roy, I want to drop the x.ybz
  designations.  I want x.y.z, a single numbering scheme.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.220     +15 -1     apache-1.3/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.219
  retrieving revision 1.220
  diff -u -r1.219 -r1.220
  --- STATUS	1998/03/26 15:17:27	1.219
  +++ STATUS	1998/03/26 19:44:45	1.220
  @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
       * Ken's slight reworking of the Apache LICENSE to clarify the restricted
         nature of usage of the name "Apache" in derived products
   	Status: Ken +1, Paul +1, Ben +1, Jim +1, Randy +1, Roy +1,
  -		Chuck +1, MarkC +1, Ralf +1, Sameer +1, Martin +1
  +		Chuck +1, MarkC +1, Ralf +1, Sameer +1, Martin +1, Dean +1
   
       * Ralf's 
         Apache 1.3 Autoconf-*style* Interface (APACI)
  @@ -402,6 +402,20 @@
   	  handling this need.
   	    Status: Dean +1, Rasmus +1, Paul +1, Roy +1, Jim +1, 
   	            Martin +1, Ralf +1
  +
  +    * Don't wait for WIN32:  It's been quite some time and WIN32 doesn't seem
  +	to be progressing, and Unix seems quite stable.  It would be in Apache's
  +	best interest to continue to support Unix to its utmost, and not delay
  +	a release of 1.3.0 waiting for WIN32 issues to be resolved.
  +
  +	Proposal: the next release should be named 1.3.0 and should be labelled
  +	    "stable on unix, beta on NT".
  +	    +1: Dean
  +
  +	Proposal: the next release should be named 1.3b6, and labelled "release
  +	    candidate on unix, beta on NT".  The release after that will be
  +	    called 1.3.0 "stable on unix, beta on NT".
  +	    +0: Dean
   
   Win32 specific issues:
   
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message