Return-Path: <apache-cvs-owner-apache-cvs-archive=hyperreal.org@apache.org>
Delivered-To: apache-cvs-archive@hyperreal.org
Received: (qmail 15347 invoked by uid 6000); 7 Jan 1998 12:50:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 15340 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 1998 12:50:44 -0000
Delivered-To: apachen-cvs@hyperreal.org
Received: (qmail 15338 invoked by uid 161); 7 Jan 1998 12:50:44 -0000
Date: 7 Jan 1998 12:50:44 -0000
Message-ID: <19980107125044.15337.qmail@hyperreal.org>
From: coar@hyperreal.org
To: apachen-cvs@hyperreal.org
Subject: cvs commit: apachen STATUS
Sender: apache-cvs-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

coar        98/01/07 04:50:43

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  	More updates..
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.54      +2 -0      apachen/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apachen/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.53
  retrieving revision 1.54
  diff -u -r1.53 -r1.54
  --- STATUS	1998/01/07 05:04:16	1.53
  +++ STATUS	1998/01/07 12:50:43	1.54
  @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@
   	Status: Doug +1, Randy +1, Dean would really prefer Ben's proposal
   	of httpd -M "config file directive" if it works.
   	Jim would prefer Ben's solution as well.
  +	So would Ken (does it obviate -d and -f if present?)
   
       * Martin's [PATCH] <Location > within .htaccess?
   	<19980105152218.30720@deejai.mch.sni.de>
  @@ -98,6 +99,7 @@
   	<34AA4B95.36726117@Golux.Com>
   	Status: Ken +1, Jim +1
   	Gregory Lundberg says it's legally invalid
  +	Alexei disagrees, citing past practice and investigation
   
       * Martin's [PATCH] 36kB: Make apache compile & run on an EBCDIC mainframe
   	<19971217184646.62136@deejai.mch.sni.de>