Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-cli-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45649 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2006 22:14:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2006 22:14:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 16130 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2006 22:14:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-cli-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 16106 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2006 22:14:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cli-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: "CLI Dev" List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list cli-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 16095 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2006 22:14:24 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:14:24 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of doug.dixon@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.196] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:14:23 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j2so1651761nzf for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:14:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=WXdZAH/ys31BRWqvA5tVz/sVdBRPH9GNkRY6HZvp4a1sdd9Ezq3a3LYC2fcTyNl1pLv3+YsNwZesknCvGoqbKDZ8q35pHym3JwF3/XQQSQAbFpKOvX5hgAxNM5mILBd7jhtYaD7na/NPR6ANOYYDiNqu0G+JBW71YNlt1/CXjog= Received: by 10.37.13.18 with SMTP id q18mr73292nzi; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:14:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.1.2? ( [203.173.140.180]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id j4sm4294068nzd.2006.02.22.14.14.01; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:14:02 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Doug Dixon Subject: Re: Intro to mod_aspdotnet Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:13:56 +1300 To: "CLI Dev" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 17 Feb 2006, at 08:31, Rob Hughes wrote: > A big selling point for me was that with mod_aspdotnet I could have a > self-contained development machine running WinXP. No Windows server > needed. Not true for IIS 6. > > -----Original Message----- > From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net] > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 6:57 PM > To: CLI Dev > Subject: Re: Intro to mod_aspdotnet > > Doug Dixon wrote: >> Hi >> >> I'm on the dev@httpd.apache.org mailing list, and have recently been >> alerted to the existence of mod_aspdotnet by some posts from Bill >> (thanks). >> >> Sounds interesting and potentially very cool. >> >> I know a fair bit about Apache, but not about ASP.NET. I think it >> would be great if your intro page (http://httpd.apache.org/cli/ >> introduction) had a persuasive 'Motivation' or 'Why use >> mod_aspdotnet?' section which explained to the uninitiated: >> >> * The initial motivation for the project >> * Why you would want to house ASP.NET apps in Apache rather than >> IIS (or maybe the other way round depending on circumstances) >> * Examples of stuff you can/can't do in each of these two > containers >> * Other considerations (e.g. performance, manageability, >> licensing > >> or other costs) with each of these alternatives - especially any >> perf > >> stats you have >> >> I for one would find it really helpful if this kind of material were >> on show up-front, as it would set the context and give a really good >> insight into what it is, and why I might be interested in using it. >> >> What do you reckon? > > I think this is an excellent suggestion; is there anyone who would > like > to take a crack at this, based on real-world application of both > mod_aspdotnet within httpd and the typical ASP.NET hosted in IIS? I'd > be happy to update the page when we come up with some text. > > Bill Thanks Bill and Rob It seems there's not very much traffic on the list, overall. Would it be an idea to directly ask the "core" people for some input on this? Cheers Doug