httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47485] HTML5 Websocket implementation
Date Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:22:15 GMT
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47485





--- Comment #7 from Senthilkumar <sendtopms@gmail.com>  2009-07-16 17:22:15 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > I am creating this BUG to track HTML5 web socket (now it is IETF websocket
> > protocol. I am able to see browsers such as 
> > 1. Mozilla Firefox (Websocket code is checked into the latest Trunk)
> > 2. Google Chrome http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_1dm97qxgm
> > 3. Webkit (Safari) http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_0fpjg22gh
> > are going to support officially in few months. 
> > This entry is to make sure apache is not missing the web socket part.
> 
> Please do not call it an "IETF" protocol. It's just an Internet Draft submitted
> by an individual. There is no IETF Working Group for this.

Ok... I am not able to understand your question. Websocket is going change the
web development paradigm and many companies and folks supporting it. New way of
web development may be at least from circa 2005, especially comet which
influenced Servlet 3.0 Spec. Is it a correct reason to omit something if it is
proposed by a single person? Do you really going to support if Army of people
suggested something useless? I tried to express my thoughts to answer all this
question
http://pmsenthilkumar.blogspot.com/2009/07/apaches-html5-websocket-conundrum.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message