httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44948] mod_substitute has a memory leak (not a leak)
Date Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:56:41 GMT
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44948





--- Comment #16 from Bob MacCallum <r.maccallum@imperial.ac.uk>  2009-03-24 02:56:37
PST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> While I agree with your patch that 
> apr_bucket_delete is better than APR_BUCKET_REMOVE and avoids a leak in theory
> I currently fail to see that we execute this code section often enough to
> produce a leak in practice. To be honest we should only hit this code section
> rarely.

But we've shown there's a leak.  I've shown that it wasn't too bad when
processing smallish content, but others have had httpd swapping out with larger
content.  If our project deploys the substitute filter, we will need it to be
rock solid on content from a few bytes up to several megabytes.

Are you implying that there is significant overhead with apr_bucket_delete()?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message