httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45863] (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address [::]:80
Date Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:52:53 GMT
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45863


MOB.COM <apache2@mob.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |




--- Comment #14 from MOB.COM <apache2@mob.com>  2008-09-24 08:52:53 PST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> If you are enough of an asshole to reopen this bug again, I'll be an equivalent
> asshole and veto all changes which improve your situation on RH; the only delta
> being that I have the karma to do so.  Comprende?
> 

I know better than to start arguing with someone of your level of
professionalism, magical veto powers, and spelling skills... as the saying goes
- Never argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level, then beat you
with experience.

I do not have a situation on RH, so there are no changes You can veto. 

I started duplicating the error and opened this thread from goodwill and cannot
believe, You are calling people assholes, for wanting improve Apache and get
bugs fixed.

> "There are over 1,000 search results"
> 
> YOUR error message indicates a program is already sering traffic on ports 80
> and 443 which mean you are already running a webserver.  Well DUH - of course
> their are thousands of reports!  There are thousands of users who didn't know
> they were running a webserver.
> 
> Take this to a user list, issue closed.
> 

Why do you think there are over 10,000 users who didn't know they were running
a web server and posted about it one the web? From the threads I read, users
initially and logically assume there is a misconfiguration in their httpd.conf,
not that another instance of Apache is already running.

Issue is the way Apache handles this, it takes focus away from the root of the
problem (pidfile) and puts focus on the resulting problem (could not bind). 

Will, You said You will use your karma to veto all changes that improve the
situation (wow!), so You admitted there is a situation that should be improved!


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message