Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16078 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2007 13:29:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Dec 2007 13:29:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 32706 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2007 13:29:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 32666 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2007 13:29:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list bugs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 32653 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2007 13:29:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:29:36 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:29:23 +0000 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 59FC7714245; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:29:27 -0800 (PST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: bugs@httpd.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44152] - litmus regression: PUT conditional on lock and etag failed In-Reply-To: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20071229132927.59FC7714245@brutus.apache.org> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:29:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44152 ------- Additional Comments From michael@metaparadigm.com 2007-12-29 05:29 ------- Just another quick note. From looking at the debug.log with 2.2.6, the last-modified date is 1 second behind the Date header. With 2.2.7-dev, the dates are equal. I'm am unsure how the patch effects the dates to cause the Weak ETag in 2.2.7-dev as it does not apparently change any date fields only reads them. I have run the tests many times to ensure it is not a timing issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org