httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42987] - Weak Etags in Apache are useless and violate RFC 2616, 13.3.3
Date Sun, 30 Dec 2007 12:26:32 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42987>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42987





------- Additional Comments From werner.baumann@onlinehome.de  2007-12-30 04:26 -------
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> There is no real problem in that Apache never matches these weak etags in
> If-None-Match.

On
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200712.mbox/%3c7002DFA0-43B9-464A-9843-B566D44980AF@gbiv.com%3e
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> If the weak etags are not being matched to the string etags on
> GET, then that is another bug that must be fixed.  It is not an
> excuse to ignore the HTTP design.

Seems to be time that Apache developers make up their mind on what they want to
achieve, so it could make sense discussing how to do it in an efficient and
comlying way.
I was mislead by the asumption, that what Apache does is what it is intended to do.

Werner


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message