httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42665] - spurious attempt to open ".../file.html/.htaccess"
Date Sat, 21 Jul 2007 09:31:38 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42665>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42665





------- Additional Comments From pulsifer3@comcast.net  2007-07-21 02:31 -------
> if r->finfo.filetype is neither APR_DIR nor APR_REG, then what?  Whoops.

The patch corrects an optimization.  In other words, the code is supposed to
work correctly even without the optimization--the entire optimization could be
removed and the code should still function correctly.  The patch corrects the
optimization so that it handles and cases r->finfo.filetype == APR_DIR and
r->finfo.filetype == APR_REG.  If r->finfo.filetype is neither APR_DIR nor
APR_REG, then the optimization simply falls through and executes the code below,
which again is intended to correctly handle all cases.  So the answer to your
question is: it does whatever it would do if the optimization did not exists.

> also I believe your change to validating the symlink status is not a valid
> change.  Please explain since that has little to do with the proposed problem
> and solution.

I don't understand what those two sentences say.  Please elaborate.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message