httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42556] - Apache with LDAP support segfaults on Solaris 9 with LDAP
Date Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:37:24 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42556>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42556





------- Additional Comments From rpluem@apache.org  2007-06-04 13:37 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Here's the pldd of a core file:
> 
> pldd core.httpd.19712.0
> core 'core.httpd.19712.0' of 19712:     /opt/adnapache/bin/httpd -k start


> /opt/adnapache/lib/libaprutil-1.so.0.2.8
> /opt/adnapache/lib/libldap-2.3.so.0.2.20
> /opt/adnapache/lib/liblber-2.3.so.0.2.20

> /usr/lib/libsldap.so.1
> /usr/lib/libldap.so.5

> I created a SysV package of apache and installed it also on a Solaris 8 and 10
> host which is configured as an LDAP client. On these two system it works fine.
> Might it be that there is a bug in the way Solaris 9 handles dynamic loading of
> libraries?

Maybe. But in general I agree with Eric that having one binary linked against
two different ldap SDKs is waiting for an accident to happen. So it might make
sense to compile httpd against SUN's ldap SDK (to be honest I am not sure if
this is possible as I am not an ldap guru)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message