Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" <bugs@httpd.apache.org>
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: bugs@httpd.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41123]  - Support of OCSP in mod_ssl (rewritten
 patch from bug #31383)
In-Reply-To: <bug-41123-7868@http.issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>
Message-Id: <20070210092956.A6F517142F8@brutus.apache.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:29:56 -0800 (PST)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41123>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41123


------- Additional Comments From rpluem@apache.org  2007-02-10 01:29 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> I modified and cleaned up the code as requested; I will upload a new patch.


>
> 3. Should I replace the HTTP connection by some calls to some Apache API ? Which
> API is available ?
> 
> 4. Probably dependent to the previous question, is there any global setting
> defining a proxy to call when opening an outgoing HTTP(S) connection ? I could
> define it for the OCSP call only, but some other code (even external modules)
> could also need it; this would lead to the same info being defined several time.
> Should I implement it only for my code ? Or can I assume that the server will
> always have a direct access to the OCSP server ?
> 

Probably not well thought out, but how about a sub request to the proxy_handler
provided by mod_proxy?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org