Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" <bugs@httpd.apache.org>
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: bugs@httpd.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41123]  - Support of OCSP in mod_ssl (rewritten
 patch from bug #31383)
In-Reply-To: <bug-41123-7868@http.issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>
Message-Id: <20070209135731.92DB8410959@brutus.apache.org>
Date: Fri,  9 Feb 2007 05:57:31 -0800 (PST)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41123>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41123


------- Additional Comments From marc.stern@approach.be  2007-02-09 05:57 -------
Is it possible to use mod_proxy connection pools ?
This would make sense, although the outgoing connection pool should go out from
mod_proxy to a separate module in order to be reusable by every module ...
This would maybe be the future best track, but it sounds a bit heavy to
reimplement all mod_proxy connection pool handling just for the OCSP connection.
Can we leave this as a future improvement and currently use the OpenSSL
connection (which works well in practice in several very big eGov sites) ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org