Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12649 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2006 09:24:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2006 09:24:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 61728 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2006 09:24:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61462 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2006 09:24:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list bugs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61449 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2006 09:24:46 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 02:24:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.198] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (209.237.227.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 02:24:45 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id A9294410605; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 09:22:44 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: bugs@httpd.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39243] - Can't post files larger than 128k onto ssl client cert secured site In-Reply-To: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20060714092244.A9294410605@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 09:22:44 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39243 ------- Additional Comments From jorton@redhat.com 2006-07-14 09:22 ------- I'm fairly reluctant to add a config directive for this. I would be happy with a "one size fits most" hard-coded limit if we could arrive at such a value; what is your input on changing the limit to 256K? Would that be sufficient or not? Overloading LimitRequestBody for such a purpose is not acceptable, no - the default is unlimited. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org