DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37100>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37100
------- Additional Comments From rpluem@apache.org 2005-10-19 22:05 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> >
> > The real solution is that AJP should have a FLUSH packet/command, IMO.
>
> Paul - you are facing a existing specification, ajp13, where we do not have that
That was also my complaint in comment #6. But we cannot adjust AJP/1.3, so we
must find a bandaid that fixes that protocol shortcoming. I think the question
is more if the bandaid I found is good or bad.
> flexibility. It sounds like an excellent suggestion for the ajp15 spec which
Maybe AJP/1.4. Does someone know where to find an AJP/1.4 specfication?
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org
|