Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15602 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2005 20:59:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2005 20:59:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 14891 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2005 20:59:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14852 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2005 20:59:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list bugs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14836 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2005 20:59:13 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:59:13 -0700 Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 99) id 8EAFC21C; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:58:52 +0200 (CEST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: bugs@httpd.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36710] - CGI output not captured X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20050929205852.8EAFC21C@ajax.apache.org> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:58:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36710 sk_np@krude.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | ------- Additional Comments From sk_np@krude.de 2005-09-29 22:58 ------- Sorry, but that's rubbish. Of course ping.exe will terminate, but ping.exe is not the matter, it was just an example. Take for another example any hello world program. It's output will not be seen by the client if this program is called by cmd.exe running as an Apache CGI. Can anybody understand the problem? Isn't it a bug if the output of an scripted CGI never reaches the user? Isn't it a bug if the same script runs well with Microsoft IIS? Isn't it a bug if (nearly) the same script runs well with Apache/Unix? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org