Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77868 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2005 16:49:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Aug 2005 16:49:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 68279 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2005 16:49:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 68056 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2005 16:49:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list bugs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 68041 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2005 16:49:03 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:49:03 -0700 Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 99) id 2B13C122; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:49:01 +0200 (CEST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: bugs@httpd.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25435] - sethandler and directoryindex not playing nice X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20050822164901.2B13C122@ajax.apache.org> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:49:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25435 wrowe@apache.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|blocker |enhancement Priority|P5 |P3 ------- Additional Comments From wrowe@apache.org 2005-08-22 18:49 ------- The workaround is SetHandler my-handler (Files won't be applied to a directory), so the bug is non-critical. The reason nd's suggestion doesn't quite work, is that SetHandler will always work, it's a Location handler that doesn't depend on any file system underneath it. The SetFileHandler/SetDirHandler would be handled by the apache filesystem core, and not the apache core uri handler, so an overloaded directive doesn't work in this case. The theory-to-be is that we should someday be able to unplug the filesystem core, and still have a useful apache which can serve other forms of non-filesystem based content, such as a pure jk, pure proxy, or pure php server. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org