httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28923] - Invalid argument for SSLMutex in ./docs/conf/ssl-std.conf.in
Date Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:30:29 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28923>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28923





------- Additional Comments From eflash@gmx.net  2005-08-30 18:30 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> > the mutex setting in ssl.conf is then optional.
> 
> Not really, you can't run without a mutex...
I meant when a proper default is set.

> > In addition I'm asking me if we cant do it already with IfModule magic, f.e. 
> > with asking for the mpm module...
> 
> No because you presume that 'worker.c', for example, tells you something
> useful.  It doesn't - on Solaris you want to avoid file:, on Win32 you
> use the default: flavor.  Better that we trust the judgement of APR of
> which is optimal, and fix any problems in APR about any wrong choices.
I meant to set the defaults like that (probably even in main httpd.conf):
<IfModule mpm_netware.c>
  SSLMutex default
</IfModule>
<IfModule mpm_winnt.c>
  SSLMutex default
</IfModule>
<IfModule mpm_worker.c>
  SSLMutex file:logs/ssl_mutex
</IfModule>

look, your idea is great, and I like it - but: when will we see it in any 
ditribution?
well, I've reported that simple issue here in May 2004 after I posted on the dev 
list, now we discuss the stuff (ok, was also 50% my fault for the last six 
months since Joe's reply); and if you fix it now in APR we will probably see it 
not before another year takes place till finally this APR goes public.....
I was after something simple which can be packported - we have this issues with 
_all_ NetWare/Win32 SSL 2.x distributions, and would be cool if we get that 
fixed before the 2.0.x line is in mature...
I think the above simple conf patch doesnt hurt anything but only fix it for the 
platforms having problems, so please commit this simple change now - regardless 
of any future code improvements we may get...


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message