httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36225] - Static/Shared/DSO
Date Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:05:53 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36225>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36225


slive@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




------- Additional Comments From slive@apache.org  2005-08-17 18:05 -------
Although I agree that the documentation on adding third-party modules is not
very user-friendly, I don't see any specific suggestion to improve it here. 
There certainly are examples under "Usage Summary".

Your particular problem is with PHP, not apache httpd.  httpd 2.0 certainly does
support static modules, but it may be that PHP has chosen not to support or
document how to build PHP in that way.  For complex third-party modules, it is
really up to the module author to document the build process.  There are too
many variations to get them all in the apache docs.

Additional docs on building apache httpd are here:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/programs/configure.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message