Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95512 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2004 18:01:57 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2004 18:01:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 17448 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2004 18:01:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 17407 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2004 18:01:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" Delivered-To: mailing list bugs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 17381 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2004 18:01:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO exchange.sun.com) (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2004 18:01:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 26875 invoked by uid 50); 8 Feb 2004 18:02:09 -0000 Date: 8 Feb 2004 18:02:09 -0000 Message-ID: <20040208180209.26874.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: bugs@httpd.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26775] New: - Vhosts unavailable in mod_status X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26775 Vhosts unavailable in mod_status Summary: Vhosts unavailable in mod_status Product: Apache httpd-1.3 Version: 1.3.29 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: Other mods AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: mc@webheberg.com Hello, When I go to the server-status page (with extendedstatus ON), it works fine, but all the Vhosts fields are marked as "unavailable". When I was using Apache on stand alone servers, it was working fine. Now I have a director and a few real servers that are doing NAT with LVS. I dont know if it could be the reason. What do you think about that ? Thanks for your help ! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org