httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20382] - Poor performance on W2000 AS
Date Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:16:50 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20382>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20382

Poor performance on W2000 AS





------- Additional Comments From wrowe@apache.org  2003-11-14 20:16 -------

  As pointed out in the dev@httpd discussion thread, it stinks but we cannot
  sendfile and either;

  * come back after a network timeout, or
  * determine the (arbitrary) amount of data sent.

  It seems the WinSock API and TransmitFile are lacking for some means of
  neatly honoring socket timeout parameters in a faux-blocking mode.

  Suggestions and contributions welcome, provided they continue to honor the
  timeout to prevent the obvious resulting DoS if TransmitFile is not timed out.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message