httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18335] New: - CGI-script handler
Date Tue, 25 Mar 2003 19:53:52 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18335>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18335

CGI-script handler

           Summary: CGI-script handler
           Product: Apache httpd-2.0
           Version: 2.0.44
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows NT/2K
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: mod_actions
        AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
        ReportedBy: BSeifert@gmx.at


I'm not sure if this can be considered as a bug, but decide for yourself.
Til today I've used Apache 1.3.26, I used the Action and SetHandler directives 
to handle the contents of a whole directory by a script. In the manual is 
written that it has to be a cgi-script. I tried the Action command with a php-
script too and it worked too.
Now I tried to use the same settings on the Apache 2.0.44 but it seems that it 
only allows cgi-scripts! (I always get file not found errors else) Is this 
intentional? I mean it's very practical if the server also supported php-
scripts to be used as handlers!!!!
Please let me know what you'r thinking about that case!!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message