httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17239] - mention the logical relation of multiple "Require" statements
Date Thu, 20 Feb 2003 13:44:52 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17239>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17239

mention the logical relation of multiple "Require" statements





------- Additional Comments From hauser@acm.org  2003-02-20 13:44 -------
Thanks for the heads-up on 2.1.

But in general, I would guess that equivalent functions will be available also
in 2.1?
If so, IMHO, the impact of such statements is a little bit under-documented.
While relatively scant documentation is o.k. for other features, I think that
security/access control/auth needs a little bit more care.
Just saying the result of cumulating certain directives is "undefined" or "ad
hoc" depending on particular implementations scares me when it is about security.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message