httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17236] - say whether it is possible to comment in a htaccess file
Date Thu, 20 Feb 2003 13:09:43 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17236>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17236

say whether it is possible to comment in a htaccess file





------- Additional Comments From hauser@acm.org  2003-02-20 13:09 -------
Thanks for the hint.

How about putting a link to
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/configuring.html#syntax in the htaccess file ?
(after all we are no longer in the paper world of sequential reading, but
hypertext and search engines are typically used today, so a user may just see
the htaccess file, but not all the rest of the documentation.)

As for the other two, what do you mean with "not really recommended"? 
I would guess it is good practice to put such files under version control and
thus  a comment with at least the version control tag would be recommended too?
Does it work or will it break something? I.e. s the Group file a configuration
file as per 
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/configuring.html where 
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/configuring.html#syntax applies or not?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message