httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15624] - if SSL is defined httpd should complain about missing mod_ssl.so, etc.
Date Fri, 03 Jan 2003 07:03:24 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15624>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15624

if SSL is defined httpd should complain about missing mod_ssl.so, etc.

hauser@acm.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |



------- Additional Comments From hauser@acm.org  2003-01-03 07:03 -------
Re 1): http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/ssl/ssl_faq.html in the "About
Configuration" Section in the question "Why do I get ``Connection Refused''
messages when trying to access my freshly installed Apache+mod_ssl server via
HTTPS?"

Re 2): OK, but please at least put something like the following additional line
into the apachectl script:
echo "For apache2 and if mod_ssl.so is present, the use of the option 'startssl'
is deprecated"

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message