httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15624] - if SSL is defined httpd should complain about missing mod_ssl.so, etc.
Date Mon, 23 Dec 2002 22:58:51 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15624>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15624

if SSL is defined httpd should complain about missing mod_ssl.so, etc.

slive@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID



------- Additional Comments From slive@apache.org  2002-12-23 22:58 -------
Two things:

1. apachectl startssl is deprecated.  If there is some documentation that
says otherwise, please point it out so we can fix it.  (The SSL docs in
general are not perfectly up-to-date.)

2. The fact that apachectl startssl does not throw an error message when
mod_ssl is not present is caused by some strategically placed 
<IfModule mod_ssl> lines.  I have long opposed these lines for just this
sort of reason, but other developers want them there to make apache
work "out of the box" in more situations.  So, even though I agree
it is bad, it is a design decision and not a bug.

Thanks for using Apache!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message