Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" <bugs@httpd.apache.org>
Date: 4 Oct 2002 02:10:45 -0000
Message-ID: <20021004021045.24469.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org>
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: bugs@httpd.apache.org
Cc: 
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13272] New:  -
    Documentation doesn't mention that SSL is not in binary dist.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13272>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13272

Documentation doesn't mention that SSL is not in binary dist.

           Summary: Documentation doesn't mention that SSL is not in binary
                    dist.
           Product: Apache httpd-2.0
           Version: 2.0.32
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: Documentation
        AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
        ReportedBy: tom@laudeman.com


mod_ssl doesn't seem to be installed as part of the binary distribution. The
documentation implies that mod_ssl is present in all cases (since no cases are
discussed when mod_ssl is not present). 

It would be nice if the SSL docs, especially the How-to gave explicit
instructions on building the SSL version. Once again, the How-to just assumes
that SSL has been built.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org