httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12151] New: - Very misleading typo in the docs on 3rd-party DSO compilation.
Date Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:40:37 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12151>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12151

Very misleading typo in the docs on 3rd-party DSO compilation.

           Summary: Very misleading typo in the docs on 3rd-party DSO
                    compilation.
           Product: Apache httpd-2.0
           Version: HEAD
          Platform: All
               URL: http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/dso.html
        OS/Version: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: Minor
          Priority: Other
         Component: Documentation
        AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
        ReportedBy: god@ogmc.ru


An example of third-party DSO module installation in the documentation page 
found at http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/dso.html lists the following command as 
the one needed to install a compiled DSO module:

$ apxs -i -a -n foo mod_foo.so

I believe it should be:

$ apxs -i -a -n foo mod_foo.la

Cost me an hour of my work type. Argh!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message