Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 68483 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2002 19:50:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" Delivered-To: mailing list bugs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 68472 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2002 19:50:03 -0000 Date: 2 Jul 2002 19:50:17 -0000 Message-ID: <20020702195017.19199.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: bugs@httpd.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10237] - Apache 2.0.39 for Windows is not compatible with Chili!Soft ASP 3.6.2 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10237 Apache 2.0.39 for Windows is not compatible with Chili!Soft ASP 3.6.2 jwoolley@apache.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From jwoolley@apache.org 2002-07-02 19:50 ------- As you mentioned, this is a Chili!Soft issue and not an Apache issue. 2.0.39 is not binary-compatible with modules compiled for 2.0.36. I'm going to go ahead and close out this report. Thanks for using Apache! PS: I'm marking it as "fixed" assuming that Chili!Soft will fix it on their end -- it's not really "invalid" nor does it fit in the "worksforme" category, so "fixed" seemed like the most appropriate resolution status code. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org