Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 26380 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2002 23:27:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" Delivered-To: mailing list bugs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 26368 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2002 23:27:36 -0000 Date: 27 Jun 2002 23:27:51 -0000 Message-ID: <20020627232751.5104.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: bugs@httpd.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10302] - Apache 2.0.39 appears to be vulnerable to DoS, possibly worse X-Spam-Rating: 209.66.108.5 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10302 Apache 2.0.39 appears to be vulnerable to DoS, possibly worse ------- Additional Comments From apachebugs@brettglass.com 2002-06-27 23:27 ------- ianh@apache.org wrote: > In the future please mail security@apache.org for security related bugs > and don't post them on the incidents mailing list I apologize; when I entered the bug reporting system it did not say that security-related bugs should be handled differently than any other variety. Perhaps the "Bugzilla" system should ask the person who submits a report to categorize the bug and divert the report to the correct mailing list. --Brett Glass --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org