Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 18248 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2002 23:44:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" Delivered-To: mailing list bugs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 18228 invoked from network); 28 May 2002 23:44:00 -0000 Date: 28 May 2002 23:44:07 -0000 Message-ID: <20020528234407.20795.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: bugs@httpd.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9412] - C CGI not working X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9412 C CGI not working jwoolley@apache.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From jwoolley@apache.org 2002-05-28 23:44 ------- It depends on what the value of the actual binary was. If there were any carriage returns or linefeeds in there, I could see this as causing a 500 error. You should really base64 encode this kind of thing. I'm going to close this out as I *think* Apache is behaving correctly here. If you can come up with a more specific test case that you really ought to behave differently than it is, feel free to reopen this. Thanks for using Apache! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org