Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 57382 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2002 18:00:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" Delivered-To: mailing list bugs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 57371 invoked from network); 27 May 2002 18:00:18 -0000 Date: 27 May 2002 18:00:21 -0000 Message-ID: <20020527180021.26932.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: bugs@httpd.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8904] - perchild: apr_proc_mutex problem X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8904 perchild: apr_proc_mutex problem jwoolley@apache.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|apr_proc_mutex problem |perchild: apr_proc_mutex | |problem ------- Additional Comments From jwoolley@apache.org 2002-05-27 18:00 ------- The problem when you run as root is that the mutex is created as root and the permissions don't get set right, so the child processes can't access the mutex. We've seen the same problem in mod_ssl, mod_rewrite, etc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org